QUOTE(mirocu @ Nov 28 2013, 11:15 AM)

QUOTE(Callidus Thorn @ Nov 28 2013, 12:08 PM)

VHS...
I remember those. They only have one redeeming feature nowadays:
All the DVD versions of Star Wars: A New Hope are the remastered ones, where Greedo shoots first. This is why I don't have the original Star Wars trilogy on DVD.
Han shot first.Damn straight! I hate it so much when they re-master movies, not to mention re-re-re-master like Lucas does!!

Han shot first because he knew Greedo was gonna either kill him or take him to Jabba alive, both options unacceptable. I have the trilogy on VHS and that bullshit isnīt there!

I still can't believe that Lucas thought it remotely believeable that a bounty hunter, who was obviously good enough to make Han nervous, could miss a stationary target from three feet away. Madness.
QUOTE(mirocu @ Nov 28 2013, 11:15 AM)

VHS is superior to DVD on so many levels. You can fast forward anywhere you want which means you never have to endure commercials or DANGER!! notices. Also you can stop the movie anywhere, take it out and store it on a shelf for years (why you would do that is beyond my point) and when you pop it back in you continue exactly where you left off. Not to mention, VHS handles damage so much better than DVD because when that gets even one tiny scratch, the disc is practically ruined while the VHS just flicker and moves past the problem whitout stuttering or shutting dow.
Yeah, I'll grant you, all the [censored] about piracy and such can be a pain, though you can usually skip the adverts with the menu button. And I only watch DVDs on my 360 since my DVD player doesn't like HD720p. The upside of this is that if I'm watching a film, and have to stop for some reason, if I put the disc back in later, as long as I haven't put another DVD in in the meantime, it'll resume from where I was.
As for handling damage, I can't really say one's better than the other. Fast forwarding, rewinding, and pausing weren't good for the tapes, so just watching them was bad for them. But DVDs are unpredictable when it comes to how much damage they can take before they stop working.
QUOTE(mirocu @ Nov 28 2013, 11:15 AM)

And donīt feed me that crap that the technology is old, like anything it can be improved. The latter NES games had almost Super Nintendo qualities while the first (and many others) almost looked like Atari games. My point is, you can improve something if you want to instead of scrapping the system for another.
And I wasn't going to. I've currently got a 3DS, so I'm still playing games that come on cartridges, so I know that technology can be updated and improved. And since I've been using Nintendo handhelds since the GameBoy Pocket, I've literally watched Nintendo do just that.