I have been playing Witcher 3 in order to remind myself the details of Geralt's story. Hmm... In every respect this game is better than its predecessor Witcher 2 - it is newer, sharper, cleaner, bigger, you name it. And yet... I prefer Witcher 2. I am actually getting bored!

Of course I already played it a couple of times, but may be I just didn't like it enough... Something isn't right. I very much enjoy playing Geralt and interacting with the other characters in the game, it's just the rest of it... is a bit... meh... too clean, too streamlined, too orderly... I dunno. Plenty of dirt, swearing and gore and I find it too clean? Too clinical and studied is perhaps a better word.
So my plan has changed thusly. I am going to play it a little bit more in order to recall a few things, then I'm going to write up Geralt's story from memory of my previous playthroughs and with the help of the Fandom Wiki - just to remind me of some details where necessary. My Geralt's story is not the canon and is not all based on the events from the game anyway. No need to bore myself playing it then.

I was never going to retell everything that happpened in the game, but only those bits that pertain to Geralt's character. This is his extended portrait, if you will. Then he's boarding a ship and sailing over to Tamriel and we fast forward to the spot in my story where he sets off for Solstheim to answer the call of Hircine - the Great Hunt of the Fourth Era is on! And let's hope that Morroblivion's Blood Moon proves more exciting than Witcher 3. Well, at least I haven't played it yet.