I got Witcher 3 going last night, and found that one of the three patches was not really a patch. I got the pre-order version (which might be the only version), which lets you install the game before the official release date but not play it yet. The first 'patch' just unlocks the game and lets you play it. I assume they did not make that available until release day. Which is actually rather clever, as it took a long time to download the entire game, and a loong time to install. The whole thing is about 22 gig, so I can see why. It probably would have really hammered their servers if everyone was downloading the entire game at once on the first day.
I noticed from the first cinematic that it is another 'Dark' Fantasy genre, which does absolutely nothing for me. I am not sure if I should think the people who write this stuff are fictional racists who hate anything that isn't human, or if they despise everything that
is human. I note that they always portray humans as enslaving every other race, apparently due to the natural racial superiority that comes with being human. But then on the other hand, they always portray humans as being nothing but petty, bigoted, violent brutes. Which granted much of RL history does support. But it also ignores much of RL history to the contrary.
After the first cinematic there was
another cinematic (so is there an actual game in here? Or is it just a 20 hour long cinematic?). Sorry, that is a pet peeve of mine. I hate games that start with seemingly endless cinematics. Yes, I am looking at you Mass Effect 1. I buy a game because I want to
play it. If I wanted a movie, I would have bought a movie.
Anyway, the second cinematic is an example of that sexual content that so many people have already brought up. I would not call it hard core porn, as there was no genitals in view. Just a lot of scantily clad flesh (does Geralt shave his legs?), which served absolutely no purpose. Except perhaps to titillate a very young audience. I would say that it also firmly establishes the heterosexuality of the male protagonist (which is of course the most important thing in any story

), but the way Geralt appears be wax his entire body seems very metrosexual, which in turn is not a great way to trumpet the fact that sausage is not on his menu. Maybe they are throwing a bone (all puns intended!) to all the gay guys out there playing, as Geralt is certainly no fem, fat, or hairy.
I also noted that his naked body seems a lot more slim and trim than when he is clothed. I guess his armor adds about 200 pounds, and an extra ten inches around the waist? I was under the impression from screenshots and the like that he was a guy in his fifties, with grey hair, a beard, and a bit of a gut that comes with age. But the guy I saw a the beginning of this game was a stereotypical hunky stud-boy, like you would see on the cover of GQ. Except for having lots of scars of course. That was a letdown. I
liked the idea that the hero was an older guy who had seen a lot of miles, and had a face and body that showed it.
OTOH, I saw some pics online of the new character Ciri, and I liked her. She has some big whopping scars on her face, which I loved. She had the usual body I (and I think most women) would murder for. But the scars take her out of the stereotypical cute girl sex symbol territory, and make her feel more like a real person.
In any case, it is all I needed to know I never want to play any further. I am glad it was free.
mALX, I am interested to hear what ESO is like as well. It sounds like I imagined. Pretty to look at, spoiled by some intentionally annoying person. Was your son in Cyrodiil? I understand that is the only player vs player area. If it was somewhere else I imagine it was an npc who attacked him. Unless it was a player using hak to circumvent the pvp rules.