QUOTE(hazmick @ May 26 2015, 11:56 AM)

Just watched Jupiter Ascending. Expected an action adventure film with spaceships and Sean Bean (the reason I decided to watched it). Got a cringey romance story starring Mila Kunis and Channing Tatum.
The action parts were good, the CGI was nicely done, Sean Bean was as good as I expected him to be. Other than that the film was 'meh' and I had to skip several scenes that made me groan with how rom-com-worthy they were.
Next up I'm going to rewatch the 'Sharpe' series for the 8347385756th time.
I just learned about Jupiter Ascending when I saw an outtake from it on a show Mila was on advertising the movie. That outtake centered around Mila (of course). My impression was mixed. To begin with, I like Mila as an actress, so I was expecting to like it if she was in it; and she didn't disappoint in her role that I saw in that outtake.
But then I followed up by watching some trailers for it (to determine if it was "Rent-Worthy") - and found her role seemed a lot different between the trailers and the outtake. She was stretching to still be good in her role, and therefore the role itself lost a lot of believability (imo).
BUT - many times when all you see are excerpts they can be taken out of context, so that could be a completely wrong opinion, and I did keep that in mind; so it was just a minor flag against it.
The action looked good to an extent; but it was a little too obviously computer graphics in all the collisions. I think it would have been a lot stronger with some more realistic collisions so we weren't reminded every time that they were keeping a tight budget on a film.
Then there was the believability of those crashes:
(Example: When a man crashes into a building and through it, I expect to see some indication he has just done that - some body twisting/spinning/wincing or flinching/some bodily damage/even just a flailing arm or change in facial expression! Nothing. He crashed into a solid structure and came out the other side as if he had just walked in through the door.
At least a change in facial expression to show either strength and determination or pain - anything. Instead there was a crash into the side of the building and Channing emerged without any noticeable indication he had just plowed through a thick wall of concrete! Nothing whatsoever to show it just happened, not even people below ducking from falling rubble! Who was the Director that let that scene pass?
Then he flew straight to Mila's side unimpeded while armies just stared at him coming; and he lands with gun in hand pointed at the enemy. It was way too uber; and way too much of a "Now we know why the other side is losing all the time" moment.
Now again; that excerpt they showed may have been taken out of context, but it is the only thing I have to base my judgement on. It blew it for me wanting to watch the movie.
Something like that breaks any chance of immersion for me, because it makes sure you know you are watching a movie instead of really seeing these things take place. So then your outlook is at a disadvantage for everything else the film has to offer, like dialogue/storyline/etc.
Some of the acting was good, but some bordered on predictable and wavered between overplayed and underplayed. In one scene it was almost trite. And truthfully, I wanted it to be good because Magic Mike was in it, lol.
What I ended up deciding was that if this movie was free on television or someone else rented it - I'd watch it through. Otherwise, it won't be seen, I won't make the trip to BlockBuster for it, lol.