I dunno. On one hand I can understand where the antidrug people are coming from, but my personal point of view is a little more lax on personal freedoms.
Those who want to keep marijuana outlawed (and maybe outlaw other drugs) simply want their children/friends/relatives to be safe. They want the people they know and love to have a nice country to grow up in. Drugs tend to push away already unsocial elements of the population and cause them to do things they don't want to happen. (murder, theft, ect...) I know a person in 11th grade who is in several 9th grade classes. He deals drugs, and I wouldn't doubt that he "samples the merchandise" from time to time. He, obviously, can't control where his life is going, as it is going nowhere fast. I see him in ten years wandering around city streets at night breaking street lights.
On the other hand, several of my friends smoke weed. I don't, at least I have't, and I doubt I will anytime soon, but I would prefer that some drugs be legal. One of my friends does marijuana, and she lives an otherwise (fairly) normal life. Does that mean that marijuana is good? No. Then there are people who need the marijuana for medicene. Should they be told that, just because some people can't control themselves, they have to die/suffer? No.
Here is a quote from a Robert Heinlein book,
For Us, The Living. It is a good book, and the law system in it seems like it would be good and work well. My quote may not be exact, but it should be close enough to convey the point. This quote is one of the laws, one of the Amendments to the Constitution.
QUOTE
Any person shall have the unlimited right to do whatever they wish to, except when this limits or infringes on another's equal rights todo so.
This doesn't make theft legal, as that infringes on other people's rights of ownership. It doesn't make DWI legal, since that iinfringes on other people's right to be safe. It doesn't make any drugs legal unless the person can control themselves well wnough that they don't do something stupid to other people.
I suggest a compromise. This should be enough to make more people, although not everyone, happy. First, make soft drugs legal, but strictly controlled. Second, make cigarettes/nicotime products and alchohal products, as well as subscription medicines, legal, but all of them under the same controls. These controls are as follows:
1. These drugs shall not be made available to minors, except on the recomendation of a doctor, in the form of a subscription, and the doctor must be liscensed by a medical school in the area he is suggesting the use of drugs for.
2. These drugs are not to be taken in a public setting, or is the person to drive a vehicle for a period of a certain number of hours, depending on the dosage recommended.
3. These drugs shall be made available to any citizen who is not a minor who wishes to partake in their use, but only if thisperson is able to collect several signatures of responsible adults in the area, saying that the person is responsible enough to control their life.
4. The doses made available to citizens who are not minors shall be strictly controlled, and based partially upon an ammount suggested by the persons who sign for them.
5. These people will also not be permitted to use the drugs in a public area, or drive any vehicle during a certain period after the use of the drugs.
5. The period after use of the drugs that the person will not be permitted to drive a vehicle will be based upon the ammount that they are recieving, and will last at least .5 hours longer than their dosage should.
This is just a suggested compromise, feel free to add suggestions.
Now, for how my words should be taken. I am a liberal 14 year old boy living in Northwestern United States. I have several friends who take drugs, including marijuana, some of whom are able to control their use, and others of whom their use controls them. Feel free to regard/disregard my oppinion based on this information.