Drittz Spartan
Sep 15 2005, 06:52 PM
In morrowind i made a guy and did nothing but train his ranging level. After many days of training it i began to think that it was becoming quite boring. I was wondering about the ranging skill in oblivion and if it will be way better. I was also wandering if they will keep crossbows in the picture. If u have any info about this please tell me.
ShogunSniper
Sep 15 2005, 08:05 PM
i belive this belongs in the oblivion thread though i have no power to move it...
raistlin
Sep 15 2005, 08:05 PM
So far i have heard that they will only have bows,but they made it extremely realistic,the arrow arches and with the havick system its fun to shoot things to see what happens.
raistlin
Sep 15 2005, 08:07 PM
i want to know if you can shoot flaming arrows not magickly but with oil .
Drittz Spartan
Sep 15 2005, 10:35 PM
raistlin i agree with u
Wolfie
Sep 17 2005, 09:55 AM
As far as i know, crossbows are out, just regular Bows this time around.
Infiltrator
Sep 18 2005, 05:02 PM
I heard of that, but I didn't actually read anywhere what is the substantial difference with ranged weapons in comparison to morrowind (besides getting stuck in wood, enemies, ect which is pure estetic)?
Konji
Sep 18 2005, 05:53 PM
That would be aesthetic? Yeah, they haven't said too much about ranged stuff.
Daikirai
Sep 18 2005, 07:15 PM
Who the hell uses ranged weapons, anyway? Even if your class is "Archer", it's still more convenient to buy or create a cheap spell.
Intestinal Chaos
Sep 19 2005, 04:20 PM
It's okay... I don't use ranged myself...
Faldwin
Sep 19 2005, 06:07 PM
QUOTE(LoneWolf @ Sep 17 2005, 01:55 AM)
As far as i know, crossbows are out, just regular Bows this time around.
There's no thrown items either.
ShogunSniper
Sep 19 2005, 09:09 PM
QUOTE(Daikirai @ Sep 18 2005, 03:15 PM)
Who the hell uses ranged weapons, anyway? Even if your class is "Archer", it's still more convenient to buy or create a cheap spell.
thats probably the reason that they are redoing the ranged part of the game. they are probably making much more effective. i wonder, do they have a to-hit roll to determine if an arrow hits still? or will the crosshairs move when you pull back the bow?
Infiltrator
Sep 20 2005, 01:55 AM
I doubt there will be a to-hit roll on arrows since it was taken off from melee weapons. "if it hits, it hits" as they said
ShogunSniper
Sep 20 2005, 02:52 AM
QUOTE(Infiltrator @ Sep 19 2005, 09:55 PM)
I doubt there will be a to-hit roll on arrows since it was taken off from melee weapons. "if it hits, it hits" as they said

but it seems lie i read something somewhere that bows still had a to-hit roll on them....they need to release info on archery.
Channler
Sep 20 2005, 03:08 AM
QUOTE(Daikirai @ Sep 18 2005, 02:15 PM)
Who the hell uses ranged weapons, anyway? Even if your class is "Archer", it's still more convenient to buy or create a cheap spell.
You try to enforce your opinion on way to many people dude..
Whilst crossbows might off been cool to have back I don't think that making bows themselves better was a bad idea.
BTW you can pluck your arrows outa where you shoot.
Daikirai
Sep 20 2005, 03:12 AM
QUOTE
You try to enforce your opinion on way to many people dude..
And you don't? I don't 'enforce' my opinions on anyone, 'dude'. But until the game is out, opinions are all we've got.
In short, shut your mouth.
Megil Tel-Zeke
Sep 20 2005, 03:20 AM
hmm we all have our opinions, but daikari you are extremely rude when you present yours. calling people idiots and saying something is stupid and crap like that. You really need to learn to be more civil, or perhaps you would like for us to treat you in the same manner

but I used archery in morrowind. and I am realy interested in the new archery system as well. I never cared for crossbows so i'm not upset about their dissapearance.
EDIT: child?... I'm 18. and since you want us to stop being mannequins you're the one acting like an boat.
Daikirai
Sep 20 2005, 03:26 AM
If you think I'm rude now, just wait until enough of you've pissed me off. I'm still living under the assumption that all of your ages consist of a single digit, since most of you flinch at the meager sound of the word 'damn'. You know, the reason people hate me is as thus: when a person's being an idiot, I don't bother pretending they're not like the rest of you mannequins. If you don't like it, tell Rane; I'm getting tired of dealing with wave after wave of imbeciles who are still under the belief that I'm going to change, or that don't realize how overly sheltered this forum is.
That said, get back to the topic, I'm done repeating my rebuttal to you children.
Thank you, good night.
EDIT: Eighteen you may be, but then you're also either a ) a hardcore Christian, b ) Sheltered to the point of poor health, or most likely c ) both.
Second Edit: Heh, I'm acting like an boat. I know the auto filter was what did it, but that just struck me as funny.
Channler
Sep 20 2005, 03:32 AM
QUOTE(Daikirai @ Sep 19 2005, 10:26 PM)
If you think I'm rude now, just wait until enough of you've pissed me off. I'm still living under the assumption that all of your ages consist of a single digit, since most of you flinch at the meager sound of the word 'damn'. You know, the reason people hate me is as thus: when a person's being an idiot, I don't bother pretending they're not like the rest of you mannequins. If you don't like it, tell Rane; I'm getting tired of dealing with wave after wave of imbeciles who are still under the belief that I'm going to change, or that don't realize how overly sheltered this forum is.
That said, get back to the topic, I'm done repeating my rebuttal to you children.
Thank you, good night.
Haha, that was the funniest damn (OMG?! WTF?!) post I've ever seen you make...
Imbecile 1. A stupid or silly person; a dolt.
2. A person whose mental acumen is well below par.
3. A person of moderate to severe mental retardation having a mental age of from three to seven years and generally being capable of some degree of communication and performance of simple tasks under supervision. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive.
Now, if you can find one thing that I've done that classify's me as a imbecile I will apoligize to you. But so far you've proved to be more of a "dolt" then me...
Daikirai
Sep 20 2005, 03:35 AM
You know what I meant by imbecile, don't get literal. And I'm not asking for an apology: I'm asking for you to shut the hell up and leave me alone. I don't recall ever walking down to your house, nailing your arms to your computer chair, and torturing you until you agree to see things my way. I'm not pushing anything on anyone. I'm stating my opinion in my own special way that comes across rudely to you. If you don't like it, eat me.
DoomedOne
Sep 20 2005, 03:38 AM
This is getting juicy.
Channler
Sep 20 2005, 04:38 AM
QUOTE(DoomedOne @ Sep 19 2005, 10:38 PM)
Yes it is..
I'd almost take you up on the whole cannalabism thing but I already ate dinner so....
Why do you think you need to be rude?
Rane
Sep 20 2005, 02:43 PM
Well, seems like this went somewhere it shouldn't have gone.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.