HyPN0
Jun 6 2006, 05:39 AM
LINKComments?
I have one.
It's really a disgrace that we have these kinds of stuff in 21st century. It would be understandable if this was happening in madieval times. But today? Even a true christian would know this is nonsence. Once a child goes through ritual of baptizing, he\she is a child of god. So much for modern society *roles eyes*
Now
don't tell me you belive in this stuff?
DoomedOne
Jun 6 2006, 05:43 AM
It looks like a joke...
HyPN0
Jun 6 2006, 05:56 AM
QUOTE(DoomedOne @ Jun 6 2006, 06:43 AM)
It most certanly is.
stargelman
Jun 6 2006, 06:54 AM
You do realize this is a joke site of course?
That's funneh.
ThePerson98
Jun 6 2006, 07:30 AM
Oh noes...this child has to be sold since he was born on a day just like any other...oh noes...whatever shall we do?
Lol
What I thought was the thing that the world was gonna end on 6-6-06. Then why didnt it end in 6-6-1006?
Fethenwen
Jun 6 2006, 08:25 AM
ROFL

.., my God, that was funny!! Hey, maybe dooms day will be 06.06 6000?
TheStranger
Jun 6 2006, 11:36 AM
This is just like the Y2K thing.
Time is an illusion, m'kay? We rationalize time by putting our arbitrary calculations on it. We came up with the distinctive idea of seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, years.
Its human understanding that makes us live in the year 2006 A.D
Consider how long the planet has existed. Is it the year 2006? No.
And, anyway, even if we are to be so trapped in our illusion of our comprehension of time is "right" then the world would have ended on the 6th of June of the year 6.
^<Transmission Terminated>^
Bofra
Jun 6 2006, 11:44 AM
QUOTE(TheStranger @ Jun 6 2006, 11:36 AM)
This is just like the Y2K thing.
Time is an illusion, m'kay? We rationalize time by putting our arbitrary calculations on it. We came up with the distinctive idea of seconds, minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, years.
Its human understanding that makes us live in the year 2006 A.D
Consider how long the planet has existed. Is it the year 2006? No.
And, anyway, even if we are to be so trapped in our illusion of our comprehension of time is "right" then the world would have ended on the 6th of June of the year 6.
^<Transmission Terminated>^
Amen! I'll just have to put my "Time is an invention"- T-shirt to honor your speech.

No, really, you are totally right, the fact that we've created time but that it now holds a steady grip on our lives controling every action is scary. Sure, it's a useful tool, but that's what it is and that's how we should treat it, it's not like we are constrained and controled by a.. screwdriver..
TheStranger
Jun 6 2006, 01:18 PM
Thanks

This topic reminds me of a sig I once saw...
"Time is an illusion.
Lunchtime doubly so."
milanius
Jun 6 2006, 01:19 PM
QUOTE(HyPN0 @ Jun 6 2006, 04:39 AM)
LINKNow
don't tell me you belive in this stuff?


*starts knocking on wood like a madman* uuuuh, okay... I won't say
anything, then...
Fethenwen
Jun 6 2006, 01:25 PM
QUOTE(TheStranger @ Jun 6 2006, 02:18 PM)
Thanks

This topic reminds me of a sig I once saw...
"Time is an illusion.
Lunchtime doubly so."
That's a good one ^^
I think it was from the Hitchhiker's guide to the Galaxy if I'm not wrong.
Bofra
Jun 6 2006, 01:31 PM
QUOTE(Fethenwen @ Jun 6 2006, 01:25 PM)
That's a good one ^^
I think it was from the Hitchhiker's guide to the Galaxy if I'm not wrong.
You are very much correct.
QUOTE
Ford slapped a five-pound note on the bar. He said, "Keep the change."
"What, from a fiver? Thank you sir."
"You've got ten minutes left to spend it."
The barman simply decided to walk away for a bit.
"Ford," said Arthur, "would you please tell me what the hell is going on?"
"Drink up," said Ford, "you've got three pints to get through."
"Three pints?" said Arthur. "At lunchtime?"
The man next to ford grinned and nodded happily. Ford ignored him. He said, "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so."
"Very deep," said Arthur, "you should send that in to the Reader's Digest. They've got a page for people like you."
HyPN0
Jun 6 2006, 01:31 PM
QUOTE(stargelman @ Jun 6 2006, 07:54 AM)
You do realize this is a joke site of course?
Yes, I wondered will you bite
TheStranger
Jun 6 2006, 01:39 PM
I was dealing with this topic as the "6/6/6" premise as opposed to content on the website.
I am blocked out from most sites here.
Channler
Jun 6 2006, 06:39 PM
Still... It has to be a really ugly day on 6/6/6.. and it is.. Rain and lightning, a beautiful way to scare the compassion out of some little kid.
Tell you the truth while i don't beleive anything will happen, as like you said, we made the thought of time, it still seems eerie..
Ibis
Jun 7 2006, 12:44 AM
We did not "create" Time = Time is the 4th dimension. We have "labeled" Time, and wrongly so, of course.
The year 2006 is all based on the Christ's birth, which has been shown to be unknown and that the early Church merely superimposed their own holidays over pagan ones to gain easier acceptance with them, so the whole June 6th, 3006 thing is relative.
But time has existed irregardless of us. Ameoba's turned to jellyfish to fish which crawled to land which turned to lizards into dinosaurs which became extinct but the small land mammals survived ... long before humans. Everything on this planet (in this universe?) ages, even rocks. So don't overburden yourself with guilt thinking that men created time, we merely noticed it going by and in our usual frantic control freak way, had to label it.
Time marches on - oblivious.
====================
And I think the 6/6/06 article may be reactionary to the new
The Omen film - which I watched the trailer for, and what I liked about it was that Mia Farrow (Rosemary's Baby) is the child's nurse. Other than that, I see no need for this again. But each new generation must scare itself I guess.
Bofra
Jun 7 2006, 12:51 AM
By time we don't mean the presumable 4th dimension but the calculation of it. Time passes on, indeed, but we decided that one hour is 60 minutes, one week seven days, on month 30/31/28 days, etc..
So that's whay I mean by "inventing" time. Also since we invented it we should be able to follow it as we wish, not be enslaved by it.
Ibis
Jun 7 2006, 12:57 AM
Hmmm, yes I do suppose that we chose the time segments. But again, I think that we more like = observed that the sun rose and set and rose again within a certain time segment. And that the moon cycles through it's many stages over and over again. Once again I see early mankind "labeling" what he sees going on around him so his own little mind can grasp the huge wonder of it all.
Hours and minutes I will give to you as inventions. Seconds are of course, self actualizing.
TheStranger
Jun 7 2006, 06:24 PM
QUOTE(Ibis @ Jun 7 2006, 12:44 AM)
We did not "create" Time = Time is the 4th dimension. We have "labeled" Time, and wrongly so, of course.
If that was directed at me, then...
I didn't say we created time. Our perception of time is based on our understanding of life on this planet... We see a distinctive night and day as two seperate "entities" if you will...
QUOTE
But time has existed irregardless of us. Ameoba's turned to jellyfish to fish which crawled to land which turned to lizards into dinosaurs which became extinct but the small land mammals survived ... long before humans. Everything on this planet (in this universe?) ages, even rocks. So don't overburden yourself with guilt thinking that men created time, we merely noticed it going by and in our usual frantic control freak way, had to label it.
Agreed... But if we were living outside the Milky Way, our view of time would be much different... If our planet had two suns, for instance... We view time as a way of relating events in terms of length as compared to, for instance the average human lifespan...
Lord DoomsDay
Jun 7 2006, 06:29 PM
QUOTE(Fethenwen @ Jun 6 2006, 09:25 AM)
ROFL

.., my God, that was funny!! Hey, maybe dooms day will be 06.06 6000?
Hy! What do you mean by "will be"? I alredy am.
The only diffrance is that I just have to get off my lazy boat and get to work.
In any case 666 is the number of the beast, do I look like a beast to you?
*DoomsDay looks at his Kajiit tail and fuzzy paws*
You know what.... don't answer that.
CR2032
Jun 7 2006, 08:30 PM
QUOTE(Ibis @ Jun 7 2006, 01:44 AM)
The year 2006 is all based on the Christ's birth, which has been shown to be unknown and that the early Church merely superimposed their own holidays over pagan ones to gain easier acceptance with them, so the whole June 6th, 3006 thing is relative.
Wrong.
The AD years are based on the year of Christs DEATH not BIRTH. The year is known, 34ad. Origionally it was thought to be 30ad but the monk who calulated it was off by four years. Or was it the other way around...
Anyway, these dates have been corroborated (big word bad spelling sowwy) through several ancient writings, Jewish, Roman and Greek among others...
And the early Church did not merely impose their holidays over pagan ones, but I know we are not supposed to discuss religion here lol, so just my 2c and hoping to avoid a flame war...
Ibis
Jun 8 2006, 06:43 AM
Oh ok, I didn't realize that. But of course, that's why A.D. is "after death." I didn't think it was actually known. But I guess if you know when Passover was that year and Jesus died the friday before Passover, then they do know, eh?
Bofra
Jun 8 2006, 10:53 AM
Ibis, A.D. is not "After Death" I'm sorry to say. It's "Anno Domini" and means "In the Year of the Lord" in Latin, wich comes from relating to the year of Jesus birth, also not his death. I'd like to know why you believe it's from his death CR2, even though it doesn't matter much since no-one can be quite sure when he was born or when he died since there are very few date notations in the texts that speak of him when he was alive.
See
here for more info on Anno Domini.
stargelman
Jun 8 2006, 11:51 AM
QUOTE(CR2032 @ Jun 7 2006, 08:30 PM)
And the early Church did not merely impose their holidays over pagan ones, but I know we are not supposed to discuss religion here lol, so just my 2c and hoping to avoid a flame war...
Moderation notice: This is not TESF. As long as the discussion remains civil, you
are in fact allowed to discuss both religion and politics, as long as the topic permits.
Tellie
Jun 8 2006, 02:39 PM
I do not believe this compassion a second, and I find it stupid superstitions, but I do not call peeps who actually believe that kind of thigs stupid...after all it is their decision so you go ahead and believe that stuff...but I do not believe in it. I have despised reliegion my entire life.
CR2032
Jun 8 2006, 03:18 PM
Hey, well I misspoke. It is taken from his death for the following reason:
Since the mistake was 4years, the CE(AD in old speak) yeardate for Jesus Birth would be 4bc, and not 0AD.
Therefore since his death can be accurately shown through texts of the era, I would say that the current dates come from His death not His birth.
If you want I can get into more detail, I am not really checking any sources for accuracy right now, just posting from memory...
As for a date notation of his life, there are Historical references that can be cross referenced in other ancient historical texts.
Also, the Bible notes in Luke 3:23 that Jesus started his ministry at 30 years of age. Work out his time of ministry you get about 3-4 years, work back from his death at 34 and you get at least his year of birth.
The book of daniel has a pretty accurate prophecy on the death of Jesus and the subsequent destruction of Jerusalem. It is accurate to the month and year.
But I'll relent with that...
Channler
Jun 8 2006, 06:50 PM
Hmm.. Interesting stuff I have to say.
Pushtrak
Jun 13 2006, 03:01 PM
A.D is Anno Domini, and the year of birth (according to legend

)
Anyway, I find it strange that the world over accepts that this is the year 2006, despite the diversity of world religions.
And I also think that the fear of 6-6-06 is both naive and ignorant.
Bofra
Jun 14 2006, 10:00 AM
Not the entire world accepts it's 2006, but yeah, most of it does.
I suppose it would be most confusing if all countries chose their own year-measuring, especially in a time like this when we constantly communicate and work cross-borders.
Intestinal Chaos
Jun 16 2006, 11:19 PM
Hmmn, my friend's birthday was on 6/6/06.
Does that count?
Ibis
Jun 16 2006, 11:41 PM
Just keep an eye on them, Chaos.
Intestinal Chaos
Jun 16 2006, 11:42 PM
Ha, I sure will.
He was trouble enough
before there was a possibility of him being tainted by demonic evil
Ibis
Jun 17 2006, 12:25 AM
Pushtrak
Jun 18 2006, 06:52 PM
QUOTE(Intestinal Chaos @ Jun 16 2006, 10:42 PM)
Ha, I sure will.
He was trouble enough
before there was a possibility of him being tainted by demonic evil

Oh noes, he's been tainted from birth according to the Christian model

Edit: That was a joke, I don't actually believe that.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.